In a step many thought would by no means come, Fb and Twitter have suspended President Donald Trump from posting to their platforms following the storming of the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. Whereas some cheered the platforms’ actions, specialists famous that the businesses’ actions observe years of hemming and hawing on Trump and his supporters spreading harmful misinformation and inspiring violence which have contributed to Wednesday’s violence.

So, how did we get right here? Right here’s a glance again and Fb’s steps and missteps over the previous 4 years.

Nov. 10, 2016: Days after Trump’s election, Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg calls the concept “pretend information” on Fb had influenced the election “a fairly loopy thought.” He later walks again the remark.

December 2016: Fb says it can rent third-party fact-checkers to fight misinformation.

April 27, 2017: Fb publicly acknowledges that governments or different malicious non-state actors are utilizing its social community to affect nationwide elections, according to U.S. authorities findings of Russian interference.

October 2017: Fb says adverts linked to a Russian web company have been seen by an estimated 10 million folks earlier than and after the 2016 election.

November 2017: Forward of congressional hearings on election interference, Fb ups that estimate, saying Russian adverts fomenting political division doubtlessly reached as many as 126 million customers.

Jan. 4, 2018: Zuckerberg declares his 2018 decision is to “repair” Fb.

March 2018: Proof grows that Fb campaigns have been used to steer the U.Okay. towards Brexit.

April 2018: Zuckerberg testifies earlier than Congress and apologizes for the corporate’s missteps, in addition to pretend information, hate speech, an absence of information privateness and international interference within the 2016 elections on his platform.

Might 2018: Democrats on the Home intelligence committee launch greater than 3,500 Fb adverts created or promoted by a Russian web company earlier than and after the 2016 election.

July 2018: British lawmakers name for better oversight of Fb and different platforms.

July 2018: After Fb warns of skyrocketing bills due partly to beefing up safety and hiring extra moderators, its inventory value suffers the worst drop in its historical past. Its shares don’t get better till January 2020.

Sept. 5, 2018: Fb and Twitter executives pledge earlier than Congress to defend in opposition to international intrusion.

October 2018: Fb invitations the press to tour a newly created “battle room” for combating election-related misinformation in what is essentially seen as a public relations transfer.

October-November 2018: Forward of the 2018 U.S. midterm election, Fb removes a whole lot of accounts, pages and teams for suspected hyperlinks to international election interference.

Feb. 18, 2019: In a scathing report, British lawmakers name for a compulsory code of ethics and unbiased overseers for social media platforms, particularly calling out Fb for technical design that appears to “conceal information of and accountability for particular choices.”

Might 2019: Fb declines to take away a video manipulated to point out Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi slurring her phrases. The altered clip is shared hundreds of thousands of occasions.

October 2019: Fb unveils new safety methods designed to stop international interference in elections.

November 2019: Fb opens a brand new misinformation “battle room” forward of U.Okay. elections.

Might-June 2020: Fb declines to take away Trump posts that counsel protesters in Minneapolis may very well be shot. Zuckerberg defends his resolution in a Fb submit. Fb additionally declines to take motion on two Trump posts spreading misinformation about voting by mail. Some Fb staff resign in protest.

June 2020: Fb says it can add labels to all posts about voting that direct customers to authoritative info from state and native election officers. This contains posts by the president.

July 8, 2020: A quasi-independent civil-rights audit criticizes Fb’s “vexing and heartbreaking choices” with respect to civil rights and election misinformation, together with Trump’s tweets on voting by mail.

August 2020: After years of a hands-off strategy, Fb restricts the conspiracy motion QAnon, however doesn’t ban it outright.

Sept. 3, 2020: Fb curbs political adverts, though just for seven days earlier than the U.S. election.

Oct. 6, 2020: Fb bans all teams that assist QAnon.

Oct. 7, 2020: Fb additional limits political adverts, readies extra labels for candidate posts that prematurely declare victory or contest official outcomes, and bans the usage of “militarized language” in reference to requires ballot watching.

Nov. 3., 2020: Regardless of fears over safety within the runup to Election Day and social media firms bracing for the worst, the election seems to be probably the most safe in U.S. historical past, federal and state officers from each events say — repudiating Trump’s unsubstantiated claims of fraud.

Nov. 5, 2020: Fb bans a big group known as “Cease the Steal” that supporters of President Donald Trump have been utilizing to prepare protests in opposition to the presidential vote rely. Some members had known as for violence, whereas many falsely claimed that Democrats have been “stealing” the election from Republicans. It additionally bans the hashtag by the identical identify, although not earlier than that and related phrases are talked about almost 120,000 occasions on web sites and social media platforms, per Zignal Labs.

November 2020: Fb and Twitter largely combat again in opposition to Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud by slapping labels on his posts, equivalent to “Official sources known as this election in a different way.” Critics say the measures don’t go far sufficient and false claims that the election suffered widespread fraud proceed to thrive on-line, pushed by Trump and his supporters.

Nov. 17, 2020: The CEOs of Fb and Twitter give assurances of vigorous motion in opposition to election disinformation, they inform Republicans at a Senate listening to. Zuckerberg and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey defend the safeguards in opposition to the usage of their platforms to unfold falsehoods and incite violence within the contest between Trump and Biden.

Jan. 6, 2021: In an unprecedented step, Fb and Twitter droop President Donald Trump from posting to their platforms following the storming of the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. Twitter jumps first and Fb and Instagram observe within the night, saying that Trump wouldn’t have the ability to submit for 24 hours following two violations of its insurance policies. Specialists famous that the businesses’ actions observe years of hemming and hawing on Trump and his supporters spreading harmful misinformation and inspiring violence

Jan. 7, 2021: Zuckerberg pronounces that the danger of permitting Trump to make use of the platform is just too nice following the president’s incitement of a mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol a day earlier. Zuckerberg says Trump’s account will likely be locked “for not less than the subsequent two weeks” and probably indefinitely.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here