In half 2 of this collection, we explored scalable unit-based pricing and highlighted a number of of the frequent pitfalls and classes the business has realized. On this ultimate article, we are going to delve deeper into the last word alignment with buyer worth: true usage-based pricing.

No matter how superior you get with the selection of your unit, the pricing essentially nonetheless boils all the way down to a flat (inside the unit limits) subscription charge — except you go all the best way to true usage-based “transaction pricing.” With transaction pricing, you merely defines a fee per unit after which assess and bill month-to-month in arrears primarily based on precise utilization. In B2B SaaS, usage-based pricing is extra the exception than the rule and is often employed together with a subscription, such that the usage-based income sometimes makes up solely 25-50% of complete recurring software program income.

Utilization-based pricing could be extremely highly effective, notably in circumstances the place the SaaS answer handles the stream of cash, and the transaction charges could be imbedded — or generally buried — within the stream of cash. Examples are clearly B2B funds for items and providers, both on the purchase facet (e.g. expense administration, purchase-to-pay, provide chain finance, freight audit and fee) or the promote facet (e.g. ecommerce platforms and different options that contact income and AR).

In such circumstances the SaaS utilization charges could be extracted from (income) or tagged onto (bills) the enterprise’ stream of cash and are thus typically seen as “value of doing enterprise,” as a part of COGS. And that may be extremely profitable for the SaaS vendor and often permits a far increased share of worth than a easy subscription ever would.

Subscriptions are seen as OpEx spend, an IT finances line merchandise that receives preliminary and infrequently annual scrutiny, notably as the answer’s worth proposition over time involves be seen as establishment. I’ve personally witnessed circumstances the place giant enterprise prospects balked at a six-figure annual subscription however fortunately allowed a really wholesome seven-figure utilization charge to be embedded within the funds stream. As OpEx it was a show-stopper. In COGS it was a rounding error.

However earlier than you get overly excited, there’s a smooth underbelly of usage-based pricing. In actual fact, I might suggest that almost all of B2B SaaS firms steer effectively away from usage-based pricing except they do deal with the stream of cash and may “tag-on” their charges. As a standalone charge, invoiced month-to-month in arrears and picked up instantly from the SaaS buyer, it’s problematic and, generally, not well worth the headache. Right here is why:

  • It’s troublesome to foretell for each the client (finances) and the SaaS vendor (income) and triggers a variety of pushback from IT patrons to “please flatten it right into a subscription.”
  • It causes money stream delays as you may solely bill month-to-month in arrears. You possibly can experiment with asking for some pre-pays to easy cashflow, however generally that’s a non-starter.
  • It sometimes causes a income delay as utilization does scale up slowly with rollout and adoption, delaying income significantly in comparison with a subscription.
  • Typically that rollout turns into a complete second, multi-year gross sales cycle. First your gross sales group sells the client on shopping for and deploying. Then your buyer success group sells the customers and buying and selling companions (consider a P2P answer) on truly utilizing it. Solely then and steadily do you notice income and money.
  • In lots of circumstances this mannequin represents the worst of each worlds: Prospects just like the usage-based mannequin whereas their use continues to be small and ramping up, making you watch for income whereas they’ve little pores and skin within the sport. However as soon as the answer catches on and quantity actually grows, they are going to push you very arduous towards an all-in “enterprise deal” that’s huge however a flat subscription, depriving you of the upside.
  • You will want a way more strong billing infrastructure to supply but additionally defend your invoices. I keep in mind all too effectively the frequent requests from F&A, triggered by buyer disputes, asking the R&D group to take their eyes off the innovation ball to supply extra detailed “billing stories” to defend usage-based invoices.
  • Seasonality and financial cycles drive variability and may precipitously shrink income month over month and, if you happen to deal with sure verticals, induce a nasty seasonality in your individual income (e.g. retail).
  • And final, however not at all least: Incentive constructions generally is a actual wrestle round usage-based pricing. Do you need to pay gross sales commissions on signature or go-live on the anticipated quantity however earlier than any income? Or wait till quantity transpires after rollout, probably months and even years later? How lengthy are your account executives prepared to attend? What in the event that they depart — otherwise you wish to terminate one? What if you happen to discover they spend all their time shepherding the rollout (and their fee) of that enormous deal they offered final 12 months quite than promoting the following? I’ve seen a variety of totally different fashions round this, making an attempt to strike the very best stability and being honest to all events. None of them was good, and all of them have been advanced and dangerous.

As you may see, there are important obstacles to usage-based pricing fashions for B2B SaaS firms. When it suits, it’s highly effective. However don’t pressure it the place it doesn’t belong.

In abstract, the fitting pricing technique for B2B SaaS firms is extremely essential — and too typically ignored or poorly designed. Completely perceive your varied buyer segments and the way they ascribe worth to your providing. Discover a scaling unit most intently aligned to that worth and use it to ascertain a tiered subscription mannequin that also is straightforward sufficient to manage. And with an affordable quantity of effort and a spotlight to it, you must get pleasure from important optimistic impression on annual contract worth, development, and retention.

Andy Stinnes is Enterprise Companion at Cloud Apps Capital Companions.


VentureBeat’s mission is to be a digital townsquare for technical resolution makers to realize information about transformative expertise and transact.

Our web site delivers important info on knowledge applied sciences and methods to information you as you lead your organizations. We invite you to turn out to be a member of our neighborhood, to entry:

  • up-to-date info on the topics of curiosity to you,
  • our newsletters
  • gated thought-leader content material and discounted entry to our prized occasions, equivalent to Remodel
  • networking options, and extra.

Turn into a member


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here